Skip to main content

Factors influencing the demand for individual voluntary private health insurance in Iran

Abstract

Background

Financial risk protection is one of the main goals of healthcare systems worldwide and prepayment system plays an important role to achieve it. There are some prepayment schemes, and Individual voluntary private health insurance (IVPHI) as a way can be affected by some variables.

Objective

This study aimed to investigates the factors affecting the purchase and selection of IVPHI coverage in Iran.

Methods

This study used secondary data from a private insurance company in Iran, collected in 2023. Data were retrospectively gathered via an online questionnaire covering demographics, health status, and lifestyle factors used to assess risk for voluntary health insurance plans. Individuals with high-risk profiles were referred to the company’s physician for a clinical examination, after which they were categorized into high-risk or low-risk groups. The insurer then decided whether to approve the purchase of individual supplementary health insurance (ISHI). After data extraction and cleaning, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify determinants of voluntary health insurance purchase.

Results

Most ISHI sales occurred in low-deprivation provinces (71%), with women (64%) and those aged 26–49 (70%) more likely to purchase. Higher coverage (Plan 4) was preferred across all age groups. Key factors influencing ISHI purchase included health status, basic insurance, and region, with moderate deprivation areas showing higher demand for higher coverage plans.

Conclusion

The findings emphasize regional, demographic, and health status disparities in ISHI purchases. Policymakers should focus on improving access to higher coverage plans, especially in more deprived areas, to ensure equitable insurance distribution.

Introduction

Financial risk protection is one of the main goals of healthcare systems worldwide [1], and prepayment schemes open the way to achieve this goal [2]. In this regard, universal health coverage (UHC) is considered a strategic means of global health [3, 4]. UHC is the goal that involves fair access to high-quality services and ensuring financial protection for health purposes [3]. Despite 75% of national health policies worldwide moving towards UHC, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced in 2022 that half of the world's population still lacks access to essential healthcare services [5].

At a global level, statistics show that 150 million individuals experience catastrophic health expenditures, and approximately 100 million people are pushed below the poverty line by health spending, of which 90% are in low-income countries [6]. The unpredictable nature of health issues means that healthcare costs entail risks [7], and risk pooling mechanisms through savings funds, national, social, private, and publicly financed health insurance are different methods to reduce this risk [2, 8]. Studies show that insurance is the best mechanism of financial risk protection and recovering the value of losses [9, 10].

In other words, health insurance controls healthcare costs through risk pooling and provides financial protection [5, 7], ensuring that standard living standards are met by mitigating the financial risks of healthcare expenses through full or partial payment of healthcare services [11,12,13]. In Iran, basic insurance coverage is provided by the government through three main insurances: the Social Security Insurance Organization (SSIO), the Health Insurance Organization (HIO), and the Armed Forces Medical Services Insurance Organization. Prior to 2017, health insurance was administered by the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare, but based on a decision at the time, it was transferred to the Ministry of Health along with financial independence [14, 15].

Health insurance has been much more prominent in in the country for low-income groups who cannot benefit from the advantages of insurance, while social Security sets premiums primarily based on wages [1], and Armed Forces insurance covers individuals in the Ministry of Defense. Basic insurance covers a range of essential benefit packages declared by the Ministry of Health [16]. Studies have reported that basic insurance coverage is not comprehensive enough to meet all the needs of insured individuals [17,18,19].

Despite the fact that basic insurance typically provides uniform coverage to 95% of the population, around 89% of services are not covered by this insurance, resulting in a financial burden on households in some countries [8, 12]. Insufficient coverage of basic insurance services and the exclusion of certain self-employed groups will cause people to pay more costs out of pocket or to purchase supplementary insurance [16, 20]. Most people opt for supplementary insurance to ensure better financial protection and more comprehensive service coverage. However, it is important to note that enrollment in these insurances is completely voluntary [21]. Research has indicated that the demand for supplementary health insurance may reflect dissatisfaction or inefficiency with basic insurance [22, 23]. Many people consider the lack of support for these insurances alongside basic insurance as a risk for increasing unnecessary healthcare costs [24].

In Iran, supplementary health insurance (SHI) is provided by various private and public entities. The Iran Health Insurance Organization plays a significant role in managing and regulating these services. Private companies also offer supplementary insurance to fill gaps not covered by basic medical insurance schemes. SHI covers services not included under basic medical insurance, such as specialized treatments, advanced diagnostic tests, and access to private healthcare facilities. These policies often provide benefits like reduced waiting times for procedures and better quality care compared to what is available through compulsory social insurance schemes [25, 26].

The development of supplementary health insurance in Iran has seen growth, with a notable increase of 34.6% reported in recent years. However, challenges persist due to limited affordability among lower-income populations and structural issues within the current healthcare system [26].

In Iran, access to supplementary insurance is possible through group and recently individual enrollment in certain insurance companies [17]. Group policies offer better risk pooling compared to individual ones [17], but overall, adverse selection and moral hazard considerations may occur due to an asymmetry of information [16, 24]. Both moral hazard and adverse selection predict that risk-averse individuals are more likely to seek insurance and purchase higher levels of coverage [27, 28]. Therefore, from a public policy standpoint, access to the sufficient amount of information about the characteristics of individuals seeking voluntary health insurance is crucial [29]. There is a vast body of scientific literature on factors affecting the demand for health insurance worldwide, which varies depending on the particularities of each country. The relationship between the three main variables of the Grossman model—age, income, and education—is one of the basic theoretical models in this field [29]. There are a number of contributing factors in the choice of supplementary health insurance which have been examined in previous studies. These factors include wealth or income, education levels, age, marital status, residency status, access to information, gender, health status, race, number of employed members, out-of-pocket payments, occupation, and number of children [1, 23, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].

Most studies in the field of voluntary health insurance have been conducted in developed countries [29, 36,37,38,39,40,41], with limited research in developing countries, especially regarding ISHI. Nosratnejad and colleagues (2016) examined the factors influencing the demand for health insurance (basic and supplementary) and found that increasing age, education, non-linear income, wealth, and opportunities for being employed in governmental sectors increase the probability of purchasing basic health insurance (BHI) and community health insurance (CHI) coverage [42]. Another study in 2014 revealed that household heads with higher education levels, income, and job opportunities have a higher willingness to pay for health insurance [43]. To the best of our knowledge, factors contributing to purchase of ISHI in Iran remain understudied and incompletely understood, this research investigates the factors affecting the purchase and selection of ISHI coverage in Iran. This study is the first in Iran aiming to shine new light on the characteristics of individuals seeking to purchase and select ISHI coverage.

Materials and methods

The current study was conducted based on the data series taken from ISHI, a private insurance company in Iran in 2023. Data for this study were retrospectively collected using an online questionnaire, covering demographic characteristics, health status, and lifestyle factors used by the insurance company to assess the risk information of the population purchasing voluntary health insurance. After completing the questionnaire, individuals with relatively high-risk profiles were referred to the insurance company’s physician for a comprehensive clinical examination. Physical examinations were performed by physicians to categorize enrollees into high-risk or low-risk groups, and then the insurer decides whether to approve the individual’s request to purchase ISHI policies. Information on 7003 enrollees was obtained from insurance company databases between December 2021 and December 2022. After reviewing the existing literature, variables influencing the choice of purchase and coverage selection for voluntary health insurance were identified and selected.

The dependent variable in this study is the type of ISHI scheme, which, considering the high diversity of schemes in terms of insurance premium, coinsurance, and coverage level, was subdivided into four groups based on the level of coverage for individuals' medical expenses. Group 4 had the highest coverage, while Group 1 had the lowest coverage for medical expenses. The independent variables in this study include the level of deprivation in the province of residence, gender, age, lifestyle, base insurance, family health history, and health status, as well as health expectations.

To assess the level of deprivation in the provinces of individuals' residence, the existing literature was examined, and ultimately, the systematic review by Kazemi and Amiri was used [44]. To examine the healthy lifestyle status of applicants, two questions regarding smoking and exercise were asked. In this study, the lifestyle variable was classified into three categories: poor lifestyle (individuals who smoke and do not exercise), good lifestyle (individuals who do not smoke and exercise), and moderate lifestyle, which includes other cases. Regarding the family health history of the applicants, they were asked about the occurrence of first-degree relatives' diseases such as tuberculosis, cancer, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, stroke, and congenital diseases, to which they responded with yes (1) or no (0). Additionally, they were asked about their health expectations: “Have you been diagnosed with the need for any surgical procedure by your physician in the next year?” This variable was also included in the study as binary (0 and 1). The health status of ISHI applicants was assessed through a series of 8 questions. These questions included developing a disease or condition that prevents them from performing their daily activities for more than two weeks, a history of loss of appetite or weight loss of more than 10 kg in the past year, lower back pain or discomfort in the neck area, joint problems, long-term use of a specific medication, a history of hospitalization or nursing home stay for more than two weeks, HIV/AIDS status, Hepatitis B or C tests, a history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or a tumor or cancer. Two specific questions were asked of females to assess their reproductive health status (infertility and history of breast cancer). The phrase “In case of any false answers being discovered, the individual's insurance contract will be voided and legal action will be taken against the offender” was also mentioned at the beginning and end of the questionnaire to encourage applicants to answer the questions honestly.

In this study, since the dependent variable was considered as an ordinal variable for insurance purchase schemes, the ordered Logit model was used to examine the factors influencing the purchase and selection of ISHI coverage. This type of model is used in surveys where respondents' preferences are classified in an ordinal ranking. Logistic regression models can be explained using the cumulative distribution function. In these types of models, the observed responses are modeled through a latent variable y* that is linearly related to the explanatory variable x:

$${{{\varvec{y}}}^{2}=({\varvec{x}}{\varvec{\beta}})}^{2}+\varvec{\varepsilon }$$
(1)

where x is a k × 1 vector of explanatory variables, β is a k × 1 vector of estimated parameters, and ε is a random variable representing stochastic errors that are normally distributed with a mean of zero and a variance of one. Data used in these analyses were derived from the insurance company’s databases. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15 (STATA Corp.) and ArcMapGis software.

Results

According to the results, 71% of ISHI sales in provinces with low deprivation levels, and 7% of sales in provinces with high deprivation level have been made. It seems that the preference for high ISHI coverage is evident in all levels of deprivation in provinces. The chi-square coefficient in this variable indicates the correlation between the type of ISHI schemes and the level of development in the province. Women (64%) were more likely to purchase ISHI than men (36%). Additionally, 70% of ISHI buyers are in the age group of 26–49, and in all age groups, Plan 4 had the maximum number of applicants. People with basic insurance (99%) constituted the majority of ISHI buyers.

One percent of the population had a healthy lifestyle, and 2% had an unhealthy lifestyle, but no significant impact of the lifestyle on the type of ISHI scheme was observed. According to descriptive statistics, 93% of ISHI buyers had no hereditary diseases, while 7% had a history of hereditary diseases. Furthermore, buyers were categorized into three health status groups: good health (90%), poor health (less than 1%), and average health (8%). As a self-assessed health variable, 99% of ISHI buyers claimed that they did not need any surgical procedures or health interventions requiring hospitalization in the next year as prescribed by their physician. Moreover, 95% of women had no health problems, but 5% of them had a medical history of breast cancer and infertility. (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics and Descriptive Statistics of Participants

The results in Table 2 show that Tehran (31%), Isfahan (9%), and Fars (7%) have the highest percentages of ISHI purchases among the provinces. On the other hand, West Azerbaijan, Kerman, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Hamadan, Kermanshah, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Zanjan, Sistan and Baluchestan, South Khorasan, Kurdistan, Ilam, and North Khorasan have the lowest percentages (less than 1%) of purchases. Of all the schemes 1 to 4, the ISHI purchasing rate was highest in plan 4 (57%), followed by plan 2 (21%), plan 3(13%), followed by plan 1 (9%). A significant correlation was found between provinces and the selected scheme type. Distribution of health insurance purchases among the provinces has been represented on the map below. (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Table 2 Geographic Distribution of ISHI Purchases by Insurance Plan in Iran
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of ISHI purchases by province

The findings of our analysis indicate that people residing in provinces with moderate deprivation levels are more likely to purchase ISHI compared to those in provinces with lower deprivation levels. In other words, more deprived provinces had a lower probability of purchasing ISHI Plan 4 (the highest coverage). This variable was statistically significant at a 95% confidence level in both models (OR = 0.77, p-value < 0.01). Men had a lower chance of purchasing ISHI with excess coverage compared to women (OR = 0.75, p-value < 0.01). Furthermore, our analysis demonstrated that all age groups had a higher chance of demanding a package with higher coverage compared to the baseline age group (0–16 years).

The higher levels of coverage were purchased more by individuals with basic insurance (OR = 3.2, p-value < 0.01), individuals with moderate health status compared to healthy individuals (OR = 1.28, p-value < 0.01), and women suffering from health problems compared to their healthy counterparts (OR = 1.34, p-value < 0.01). Individuals who expected to require a clinical intervention in the next year chose lower coverage ISHI plans compared to those who did not expect it (OR = 0.56, p-value < 0.01). Individuals with a history of hereditary diseases are less likely than healthy ones to purchase ISHI with higher coverage (0.12 > OR = 0.86, p-value), although the relationship between this variable and lifestyle was not statistically significant (p-value > 0.05). In addition, the logistic regression coefficient indicated the goodness of fit of our parametric specification in both models (p-value < 0.01). (Table 3).

Table 3 Results of logistic regression analysis for factors influencing the purchase of ISHI

Discussion

In many countries, a significant proportion of the population takes steps to purchase supplementary insurance coverage along with basic insurance in order to have excess healthcare coverage. While supplementary health insurance has become fairly widespread in Iran, no single study exists that has adequately examined the factors influencing the purchase of ISHI (Iranian Supplementary Health Insurance). This study was conducted for the first time to identify the factors that influence the purchase and selection of ISHI coverage. The results indicate that three provinces (Tehran, Isfahan, and Fars) accounted for a total of 47% of ISHI purchases, while each of the remaining 13 provinces did less than 1% of purchases. The highest and lowest proportion of ISHI purchases belonged to Plan 4 and Plan 1, respectively. The majority of ISHI was purchased in provinces with lower levels of deprivation. This could be attributed to the fact that households in more developed provinces have higher average incomes and better access to healthcare facilities.

According to the results, more women than men purchased ISHI coverage. This could be due to the presence of relatively strong risk-averse preferences in women compared to men [45], as more risk-averse individuals are more likely to purchase insurance [28, 46]. In other words, women prefer to purchase insurance to protect themselves from potential future healthcare expenses. However, both groups selected ISHI plans with high coverage levels. Different age groups have shown varying preferences for purchasing ISHI, with the middle-aged group (26–49 years) demonstrating the highest demand for this insurance. This can be attributed to their active participation in the workforce and their greater purchasing power [47]. Middle-aged individuals have also to invest in supplementary health insurance, as supported by shown a higher willingness previous research[23, 30, 33, 48]. However, the company's policy of not supplying insurance to individuals over 69 years old significantly influences this finding. Furthermore, studies have suggested that young people tend to be more risk-averse [23], as a result, they are less willing to purchase health insurance. In contrast, middle-aged individuals, feeling the effects of aging more, seem to be more willing to purchase coverage. In addition, most ISHI purchasers are individuals with comprehensive basic insurance (99%), and their likelihood of purchasing ISHI is 3.2 times higher than those without basic insurance, showing a statistically significant difference. However, this difference may arise from the company’s rejection of individuals without basic insurance. If an applicant has basic insurance, the company will cover a portion of their healthcare expenses (30% in private centers and 70–90% in government centers), making it advantageous for the company to provide ISHI coverage only to individuals with basic insurance.

While previous studies have reinforced the impact of health status on the purchase of supplementary health insurance, a conclusively empirical relationship has not been established [23, 49]. The study findings indicate a direct correlation between health status (history of disease) and the demand for IVPHI, with individuals in better health purchasing more ISHI, a finding supported by Tavares [50] and Doiron et al. [28] Despite examining various models in a study by Saliba, no data was found on the association between health status and the purchase of supplementary insurance [51]. Boulin and his associates investigated the relationship between health status and the likelihood of using voluntary health insurance in the United States and European countries, in which the authors found a negative correlation between health status and the probability of utilizing voluntary health insurance [29].

In the current research, a healthy lifestyle refers to non-smoking and physical activity, while an unhealthy one refers to smoking and lack of physical activity. 97% of individuals who had purchased health insurance fell in the moderate group (non-smoking and exercising). Nevertheless, studies show a direct and indirect correlation between a healthy lifestyle and the willingness to purchase ISHI [52]. In the second model of this study, the main independent variable, which was women's health status, indicated that the purchase of ISHI is higher among women who stated that they had no health problems compared to women with health problems. In other words, this model also demonstrated that healthy individuals purchase more ISHI compared to those who are less healthy. Certain limitations of the study must be noted when interpreting the findings:

  • Since the information of only individuals who have purchased insurance is registered in a database system of insurance, lack of access to information of individuals excluded due to reasons such as being high risk is one of the limitations of the study.

  • The data is self-reported and may contain some systematic errors, self-censorship, or dishonesty by the respondents.

  • Due to the lack of recording insurance purchasers’ income, the current study was unable to analyze this important variable.

  • This study is limited in terms of measuring self-censorship and lack of honesty in responding to applicants' questions.

Conclusion

Insufficient coverage by basic insurance has led to the emergence of supplementary insurance markets in many countries to provide services beyond basic coverage.

Supplementary insurance companies, aware of asymmetric information, risk magnitude, and the probability of induced demand and moral hazard in the ISHI market have always entered this market cautiously and primarily sell group health insurance premiums and policies. However, recently, Iranian private insurance companies have started selling ISHI, which was the focus of this study in examining the characteristics of ISHI purchasers. The majority of purchasers were from developed provinces, women, the middle-aged group, and individuals with good health status. Overall, the entry of supplementary insurance companies into the ISHI market entails more risk, and it is recommended to consider the characteristics of ISHI purchasers for improving future ISHI sales.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

BHI:

Basic health insurance

CHI:

Community health insurance

HIO:

Health insurance organization

ISHI:

Individual supplementary health insurance

IVPHI:

Individual voluntary private health insurance

SHI:

Supplementary health insurance

SSIO:

Social security insurance organization

UHC:

Universal health coverage

WHO:

World Health Organization

References:

  1. Hajikhani S, Hessam S, Asl IM, Maher A. Identifying the components of complementary insurance service packages in Iran. Int J Futur Gener Commun Netw. 2020;13:532–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayked EM, Toleha HN, Chekole BB, Workneh BD, Kahissay MH. Willingness to pay for social health insurance in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1089019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tangcharoensathien V, Tisayaticom K, Suphanchaimat R, Vongmongkol V, Viriyathorn S, Limwattananon S. Financial risk protection of Thailand’s universal health coverage: results from series of national household surveys between 1996 and 2015. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fiestas Navarrete L, Ghislandi S, Stuckler D, Tediosi F. Inequalities in the benefits of national health insurance on financial protection from out-of-pocket payments and access to health services: cross-sectional evidence from Ghana. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34:694–705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sydney NNTO, Ferdinand K, Martin AD, Lorena D. Do national health insurance schemes guarantee financial risk protection in the drive towards Universal Health Coverage in West Africa? a systematic review of observational studies. medRxiv. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tewele A, Yitayal M, Kebede A. Acceptance for social health insurance among health professionals in government hospitals, Mekelle City, North Ethiopia. Adv Public Health. 2020;2020:6458425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aguiar-Díaz I, Ruiz-Mallorqui MV. Private health insurance and financial risk taking in spain-the moderating effect of subjective risk tolerance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijerph192316248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed S, Hoque ME, Sarker AR, Sultana M, Islam Z, Gazi R, Khan JA. Willingness-to-pay for community-based health insurance among informal workers in urban Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0148211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeanningros H, McFall L. The value of sharing: Branding and behaviour in a life and health insurance company. Big Data Soc. 2020;7:2053951720950350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Organization WH. World health statistics 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lockwood LM. Health insurance increases financial risk. 2022.

  12. Kavosi Z, NorouzSarvestani E, Bordbar N, Bayati M, Lotfi F. Influencing factors on buying health supplemental insurance by the Staff of Shiraz University of medical sciences. Health Manag Inf Sci. 2019;6:119–25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nyoni T. Determinants of demand for health insurance: a case study of public service employees in Zimbabwe. Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ. 2020;6(6):1290–313.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davari M, Haycox A, Walley T. The Iranian health insurance system; past experiences, present challenges and future strategies. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41:1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Karyani AK, Sari AA, Woldemichael A. Eliciting preferences for health insurance in Iran using discrete choice experiment analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8:488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Winssen K, van Kleef R, van de Ven W. Can premium differentiation counteract adverse selection in the Dutch supplementary health insurance? A simulation study. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19:757–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perronnin M, Raynaud D. Group complementary health insurance: means of implementation that vary according to the firm. Health Policy. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blewett LA, Ward A, Beebe TJ. How much health insurance is enough? Revisiting the concept of underinsurance. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:663–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ifeagwu SC, Yang JC, Parkes-Ratanshi R, Brayne C. Health financing for universal health coverage in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Glob Health Res Policy. 2021;6:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mossialos E, Thomson S, World Health Organization. Voluntary health insurance in the European Union. Geneva: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mathur T. Marketing health insurance products: sources and consequences of customers’ confusion. Int J Healthc Manag. 2021;14:1337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Costa-Font J, García-Villar J. Risk attitudes and the demand for private health insurance: the importance of ‘captive preferences.’ Ann Public Coop Econ. 2009;80:499–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tavares AI. Voluntary private health insurance demand determinants and risk preferences: evidence from SHARE. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2020;35:685–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Einav L, Finkelstein A. Moral hazard in health insurance: what we know and how we know it. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2018;16:957–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Motlagh SN, Gorji HA, Mahdavi G, Ghaderi H. Main determinants of supplementary health insurance demand: (case of Iran). Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7:285.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gol-Alizadeh E, Pirouzian A, Jabbari MR. Improving supplemental health insurance in Iran and how to achieve it. Iran J Health Insur. 2018;1:2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Finkelstein A, McGarry K. Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev. 2006;96:938–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Doiron D, Jones G, Savage E. Healthy, wealthy and insured? The role of self-assessed health in the demand for private health insurance. Health Econ. 2008;17:317–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bolin K, Hedblom D, Lindgren A, Lindgren B. Asymmetric information and the demand for voluntary health insurance in Europe. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Medard T, Yawe BL, Bosco OJ. Determinants of demand for private health insurance in Uganda. Afr J Econ Rev. 2022;10:25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Salari P, Akweongo P, Aikins M, Tediosi F. Determinants of health insurance enrolment in Ghana: evidence from three national household surveys. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34:582–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shao L, Wang Y, Wang X, Ji L, Huang R. Factors associated with health insurance ownership among women of reproductive age: a multicountry study in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0264377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Duku SKO. Differences in the determinants of health insurance enrolment among working-age adults in two regions in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mhlanga D, Dunga SH. Determinants of demand for health insurance in South Africa. The Int J Soc Sci Humanit Stud. 2020;12:238–54.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Amu H, Seidu A-A, Agbaglo E, Dowou RK, Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, Kissah-Korsah K. Mixed effects analysis of factors associated with health insurance coverage among women in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0248411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cutler DM, Finkelstein A, McGarry K. Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: explaining a puzzle of insurance. Am Econ Rev. 2008;98:157–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonsang E, Costa-Font J. Buying control?‘Locus of control’and the uptake of supplementary health insurance. J Econ Behav Organ. 2022;204:476–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chiappori PA, Jullien B, Salanié B, Salanie F. Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications. Rand J Econ. 2006;37:783–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lange R, Schiller J, Steinorth P. Demand and selection effects in supplemental health insurance in Germany. Geneva Pap Risk Insurance Issues Pract. 2017;42:5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Johar M, Jones G, Keane MP, Savage E, Stavrunova O. The demand for private health insurance: do waiting lists matter?–revisited. Oxford: Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ćurak M, Kovač D, Poposki K. T e drivers of voluntary private health insurance demand in European countries. Ekonomska Misao I Praksa. 2021;30:457–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nosratnejad S, Rashidian A, Mehrara M, Jafari N, Moeeni M, Babamohamadi H. Factors influencing basic and complementary health insurance purchasing decisions in Iran: analysis of data from a national survey. World Med Health Policy. 2016;8:179–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nosratnejad S, Rashidian A, Mehrara M, Sari AA, Mahdavi G, Moeini M. Willingness to pay for social health insurance in Iran. Global J Health Sci. 2014;6:154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazemi N, Amini J. Deprivation spatial concentration in a developing country: evidence from Iran. Reg Sci Policy Pract. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/rsp3.12560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Burgaard J, Steffensen M. Eliciting risk preferences and elasticity of substitution. Decis Anal. 2020;17:314–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Asuming PO, Gaisie DA. Risk attitudes and demand for insurance: micro evidence from Ghana. Rev Behav Financ. 2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1108/RBF-01-2022-0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ebrahimzadeh J, Arab M, Emamgholipour S. Determinants of supplementary health insurance demand: case study of Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44:1563–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mpuuga D, Yawe BL, Muwanga J. Determinants of demand for health insurance in Uganda: An analysis of utilisation and willingness to pay. Tanzan Econ Rev. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.56279/ter.v10i1.53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kiil A. What characterises the privately insured in universal health care systems? A review of the empirical evidence. Health Policy. 2012;106:60–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tavares AI, Marques I. Multi-layer health insurance coverage, medical services use and health in a universal national health system, the case of Portugal. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22:141–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Saliba B, Ventelou B. Complementary health insurance in France who pays? Why? Who will suffer from public disengagement? Health Policy. 2007;81:166–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kalouguina V, Wagner J. How do health, care services consumption and lifestyle factors affect the choice of health insurance plans in Switzerland? Risks. 2020;8:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the support provided by KUMS, which enabled us to conduct this study.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (KUMS), Grant No. 4030661.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rajabali Daroudi, Reza Hashempour, and Sajad Ramandi contributed to study conception, data analysis, and drafting. Behzad Raei and Kamran Irandoust designed methodologies and provided insights into policy implications. Ali Kazemi-Karyani and Jafar Yahyavi Dizaj analyzed datasets and revised intellectual content. Nasrin Abolhasanbeigi Gallehzan, and Marjan Darabi ensured ethical considerations were met during research conduct. Ali Kazemi-Karyani coordinated team efforts throughout the project phases. All authors have written or significantly contributed to this article and have approved its final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jafar Yahyavi Dizaj.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study utilized a local database retrospectively, and as such, informed consent from participants was not required. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.KUMS.REC.1403.344).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daroudi, R., Hashempour, R., Raei, B. et al. Factors influencing the demand for individual voluntary private health insurance in Iran. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 23, 7 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12962-025-00609-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12962-025-00609-9

Keywords