Skip to main content

Table 5 Overview of systematic reviews

From: A cost-utility analysis of long-acting insulin analogues (detemir, glargine and degludec) for the treatment of adult type 1 diabetes in South Africa

 

Cochrane

NICE

Martin

Number of RCTs included

n = 26

n = 51

n = 31

Methods

Random effects model meta-analysis

Network Meta-analysis

Network Metanalysis

Search date

24 August 2020

Unclear. Most recent study from 2018

January 2021. Most recent study from 2018

Review question/scope

To compare the effects of long-term treatment with (ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues to NPH insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn) or another (ultra-)long-acting insulin analogue in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Detemir versus degludec versus glargine versus NPH

First generation insulin analogues (detemir, NPH and glargine-U100) vs second generation insulin analogues (degludec-U100, glargine-U300)

Comparisons considered

Detemir vs NPH

Glargine vs NPH

Detemir vs Glargine

Degludec vs Detemir

Degludec vs Glargine

Detemir vs NPH:

Detemir once daily vs NPH once daily

Detemir once/twice daily vs NPH once/twice daily

Detemir twice daily vs NPH twice daily

Detemir vs Glargine-U100:

Detemir twice daily vs Glargine once daily

Detemir once/twice daily vs Glargine once daily

Degludec-U100 once daily vs Glargine-U100 once daily:

Degludec-U200 once daily vs Glargine-U300 once daily

Degludec vs Glargine (concentration not defined)

Degludec once daily vs Glargine twice daily

Degludec once daily vs Glargine once daily

Glargine-U100 vs NPH:

Glargine-U100 once daily vs NPH four times daily

Glargine-U100 once daily vs NPH once/twice daily

Glargine-U100 once daily vs NPH twice daily

Glargine-U100 once daily vs NPH twice or more daily

Degludec-U100 once daily vs Detemir once daily

Glargine-U300 once daily vs Glargine-U100 once daily

Glargine-U100 once daily vs Glargine-U100 twice daily

Detemir once daily vs Detemir twice daily:

:

Inclusion criteria

Included studies on children and subsequently also performed subgroup analyses on studies that included adults

Only included studies > 24 weeks in length

Included unpublished data (subgroup analysis also performed)

Excluded studies in which participants were younger than 18

Included studies of any duration

Only included adults

Excluded studies if < 12 weeks duration. Main analysis reported > 24 weeks (main analysis), > 12 weeks reported as sensitivity analysis

Had to report on at least one of the following: HbA1c, weight change, severe hypoglycaemia (event requiring assistance), nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia severe hypoglycaemia occurring at night defined at 23:00–06:00), confirmed hypoglycaemia (< 3 mmol/L), nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia

Excluded participants with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia

• Excluded if pregnant, child or breastfeeding

Primary trial outcomes

All-cause mortality

Health-related quality of life

Severe hypoglycaemia

Non-fatal myocardial infarction/stroke

Severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia

Serious adverse events

HbA1c

HbA1c

Nocturnal hypoglycaemia

Severe hypoglycaemia

DKA

Time in target glucose range

Time spent in hypoglycaemic range

Quality of life including patient satisfaction

Adverse events

o Cancer

o Injection site issues

o Weight gain/loss

o Hospital admissions

o Frequency of hospitalization related to diabetes

o Ambulance call-outs

o Mental health outcomes (daily burden, fear of hypoglycaemia, treatment burden, diabetes burnout)

Efficacy: HbA1c

Safety:

Confirmed hypoglycaemia

Confirmed nocturnal hypoglycaemia

Severe hypoglycaemia

Nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia

Change in body weight