Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Data analysis for the costs and the benefits (e.g., PROMIS Physical Function with Mobility Aid short form and PROMIS 29 + 2 results) for each intervention arm, each consisting of three sub-groups

From: Health economic evaluation of trans-tibial prosthetic suspension systems: a protocol for a pilot using an observational study and synthetic cohort

  

Interventions

Passive-suction (PS)

Vacuum-assisted suction (VAS)

Sub-groups*

Year 0–1 (µ)

Costs and Benefits

PS(Y0-1)/n

VAS(Y0-1)/n

Year 1–2 (µ)

Costs and Benefits

PS(Y1-2)/n

VAS(Y1-2)/n

Year 2–3 (µ)

Costs and Benefits

PS(Y2-3)/n

VAS(Y2-3)/n

µ Costs (Y0-3)

[PS(Y0-1)/n] + [PS(Y1-2)/n] + [PS(Y2-3)/n]/3

[VAS(Y0-1)/n] + [VAS(Y1-2)/n] + [VAS(Y2-3)/n] / 3

µ Benefits (Y0-3)

[PS(Y0-1)/n] + [PS(Y1-2)/n] + [PS(Y2-3)/n]/3

[VAS(Y0-1)/n] + [VAS(Y1-2)/n] + [VAS(Y2-3)/n] / 3

ICERs/ICUR

VAS(Y0-3) µ Cost—PS(Y0-3) µ Cost

VAS(Y0-3) µ Benefits—PS(Y0-3) µ Benefits