Table 5 Results of the sensitivity analyses
Scenario | Incremental cost mean (95% CI) | Incremental QALY mean (95% CI) | ICER mean (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Base case | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.049 (-0.195–0.097) | Dominated |
1. Versteegh et al. mapping algorithm (50) | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.023 (-0.186–0.140) | Dominated |
2. McKenzie and van der Pol mapping algorithm (51) | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.034 (-0.18–0.113) | Dominated |
3. Dutch tariffs to estimate QLU-C10D utility scores | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.045 (-0.176–0.865) | Dominated |
4. German tariffs to estimate the QLU-C10D utility scores | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.046 (-0.180–0.089) | Dominated |
5. Complete case analysis | 1,372 (-4,914–7,659) | -0.003 (-0.116–0.109) | Dominated |