Skip to main content

Table 2 Cost-effectiveness analysis for the three policy options over a two-week timeframe, Uganda 2020

From: Cost effectiveness and decision analysis for national airport screening options to reduce risk of COVID-19 introduction in Uganda, 2020

Outcome

Option 1:

No symptom screening or testing

Option 2:

Mandatory symptom screening for all, testing only the symptomatic

Option 3:

Mandatory quarantine and testing for all

Infected travellers entering at airport

3,375

3,375

3,375

Identified through intervention (all persons who test true positive in isolation)

0 †

1,965

3,105

Infected travellers who enter community

3,375

1,472

1,010

First-generation cases resulting from Infected travellers who enter community

7,277

2,329

2,179

Expected cost per traveller

$0

$19

$766

Total costs for intervention (US$)

$0

$1,271,431

$51,684,999

Cases averted compared with Option 1

0

4,948

5,097

ICER cost/case averted*

-

$257

$10,139

  1. *ICER: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER = (Costs2-Costs1)/(Effectiveness2-Effectiveness1)
  2. † Cases would be identified for Option 1, but not under government perspective