Skip to main content

Table 2 Perioperative outcomes comparison between GST and non-GST patient group (n = 121)

From: Real-world effectiveness of a new powered stapling system with gripping surface technology on the intraoperative clinical and economic outcomes of gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Events

n (%)

P-value

GST (n = 59)

Non-GST (n = 62)

IA intervention proportion

37

(62.7%)

55

(88.7%)

0.0008

IB proportion

11

(18.6%)

54

(87.1%)

 < 0.0001

IS proportion

25

(42.4%)

40

(64.5%)

0.015

IE proportion

14

(23.7%)

25

(40.3%)

0.051

IP proportion

12

(20.3%)

26

(41.9%)

0.011

PB proportion

1

(1.7%)

 

0

0.3

Postoperative leak proportion

2

(3.4%)

1

(1.6%)

0.61

Events

Median (Q1, Q3)

P-value

IA intervention times

1 (0; 2)

2 (1; 3)

 < 0.0001

Suture times

0 (0; 1)

1 (0; 1)

0.0099

Electrocoagulation times

0 (0; 0)

0 (0; 1)

0.043

Pression times

0 (0; 0)

0 (0; 1)

0.0059

  1. Intraoperative anastomosis (IA); Intraoperative Bleeding (IB); Intraoperative Electrocoagulation (IE); Postoperative Bleeding (PB); Intraoperative Suture (IS); Intraoperative Compression (IC); Intraoperative Pression (IP)
  2. As some of the outcomes are not normally distributed, we used Mann–Whitney-U Test to test the difference between GST and Non-GST group, therefore, the results are presented in Median (Q1, Q3)
Back to article page

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

ISSN: 1478-7547

Contact us