Cost-effectiveness of seven-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule for acute stroke patients

Table 4 Results of sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis from public healthcare and long-term care payerʼs perspective

Parameter	Lower case			Base case			Upper case
Parameter	ΔQALY	ΔCost ($)	($/QALY)	ΔQALY	ΔCost ($)	ICER ($/QALY)	ΔQALY	ΔCost ($)	ICER ($/QALY)
Efficacy of the intervention (risk ratio of mRS0-2 patients)	0.083	− 652	Dominant	0.132	− 1524	Dominant	0.182	− 2424	Dominant
mRS distribution (mRS3-5)	0.093	− 430	Dominant				0.184	− 3138	Dominant
mRS distribution (mRS0-2)	0.164	− 2000	Dominant				0.10	− 917	Dominant
Discount rate	0.138	− 1603	Dominant				0.148	− 1452	Dominant
Utilization rates of long-term care services	0.132	− 909	Dominant				0.132	− 1472	Dominant
Rehabilitation fee	0.132	− 689	Dominant				0.132	− 1943	Dominant
Long-term care service fee	0.132	− 344	Dominant				0.132	− 3885	Dominant
# of rehabilitation units per day	0.132	− 1654	Dominant				0.132	− 1234	Dominant
Time horizon (10 years)							0.20	− 1565	Dominant

ISSN: 1478-7547