Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Case base results

From: Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain

 

Atezolizumab

Pembrolizumab

Incremental

Cut-off 2018

Cut-off 2020

Cut-off 2018

Cut-off 2020

Cut-off 2018

Cut-off 2020

Costs in ‘PFS’state

€ 105,418

€ 149,213

€ 160,618

€ 227,894

€ − 55,200

€ − 78,681

Treatment (intevention)

€ 95,225

€ 136,135

€ 151,300

€ 216,299

€− 56,075

€ − 80,164

Other healthcare costs

€ 10,193

€ 13,079

€ 9,318

€ 11,595

€ + 875

€ + 1,494

Costs in ‘PPS’state

€ 14,307

€ 12,171

€ 12,778

€ 15,588

€ + 1,529

€ − 3,417

Subsequent treatment

€ 5,681

€ 5,534

€ 5,681

€ 5,534

0

0

Other healthcare costs

€ 8,626

€ 6,637

€ 7,097

€ 10,054

€ + 1,529

€-3,417

Costs ‘end-of-life’

€ 11,176

€ 11,477

€ 11,766

€ 11,286

€ − 590

€ + 191

Total costs

€ 130,901

€ 172,861

€ 185,162

€ 254,769

€ − 54,261

€− 81,907

LYs in PFS

1.93

2.15

1.74

1.79

 + 0.18

 + 0.36

LYs in progression

2.92

2.25

2.41

3.41

 + 0.52

− 1.16

Total LYs

4.85

4.40

4.15

5.20

 + 0.70

− 0.80

QALYs in PFS

0.99

1.43

1.06

1.61

− 0.07

− 0.18

QALYs in progression

2.46

1.73

1.97

2.27

 + 0.49

− 0.54

Total QALYs

3.45

3.16

3.04

3.88

 + 0.42

− 0.72

ICER (€/LY gained)

Dominant*

Less LY*, less cost

ICUR (€/QALY gained)

Dominant*

Less QALY*, less cost

  1. LY life years, QALY quality-adjusted life years, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICUR incremental cost-utility ratio
  2. *Ratios are not shown as it is a dominant option or a less QALYs/less cost option