Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Fig. 3

From: Comparing swab- and different symptoms-based strategies to ascertain COVID-19 recovery in healthcare workers: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Fig. 3

Tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analyses comparing symptoms-based strategy with swabs scheduled at 10 and 17 days (SY10-17) with alternative symptoms-based strategy scheduled at 14 and 17 days (SY14-17, A) or only one swab at 17 days (SY17, B). t: recovery probability at every time points in the different strategies, eff: working days saved (effectiveness), the number after parameter “t” or “eff” refers to the time point of the decision tree (i.e. t1_SY17 refers to the recovery probability at the first time point in the symptoms based strategy owith nly one swab at 17 days), hcw: number of health care workers to be tested, c_kit: cost of SARS-CoV-2 test kit, c_ppe: cost of personal protective equipment, c_man: cost of maintenance, c_nurse and c_tec: cost oh human resources (nurse and laboratory technicians)

Back to article page