Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Classification system for surrogate acceptability

From: Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review

Explicit yes = yes (e)

Statement that the surrogate was accepted, valid, established or clinically relevant

  Implicit yes*

‘Used before’ = yes (ref)

Statement that the surrogate has been used for other, earlier drugs in this indication

‘Guidelines’ = yes (guid)

Statement that the surrogate is identified in guidelines as appropriate

‘Evidence 1’ = yes (e1)

Statement that there is some evidence linking the surrogate to the final outcome

‘Evidence 2’ = yes (e2)

Statement that there is some evidence linking the drug to the final outcome

No statement = (N/S)

 

No qualitative statement whether the surrogate was acceptable or not

Not applicable = (N/A)

 

No review was conducted or available

  Implicit no

‘Reference’ = no (ref)

Statement of reference to other (preferred) outcomes but no direct comment on the surrogate

‘Evidence 2’ = no (e2)

Statement that there is no evidence linking the drug to final outcomes

  Explicit no

‘Evidence 1’ = no (e1)

Statement that there is no evidence linking the surrogate outcome to final outcomes

  1. *Could additionally record a statement of concern.